PDA

View Full Version : PS3 or Xbox360


charlton5
1st June 2006, 12:08 PM
i mean i no ps3 aint owt yet bt wt do yas al rekon wil be better?

-Aaron-
1st June 2006, 12:42 PM
ps3 deffo, be expensive tho

Lloydy
1st June 2006, 01:05 PM
ps3 is going to blow it, but im liking the sound of the new nintendo more n more, it looks fucking mint

Dj Nicksy
1st June 2006, 01:08 PM
P S 3 ! :10001:

preston
1st June 2006, 01:23 PM
deffos ps3

LEWISK
1st June 2006, 01:37 PM
ps3 all the way lol

charlton5
1st June 2006, 01:37 PM
i rekon ps3 an al lyk but ye it is gna be canny expensive bt the graphics wil be top quality:1498:

Dj RoB ST
1st June 2006, 02:52 PM
Wont Stay Expensive, When It Comes To Xmas Times They Have To Compete With The Other Consoles, So They Will Soon Drop Prices When Someone First Bites The Bullet And Reduces Theres First.

Usual Crack Is The Last One Out Is The Best Spec Like, But Reckon All Of Em Will Be Unreal Like

Tommy2k4
1st June 2006, 03:37 PM
Ps3:7481: :541:

Marky_P
3rd June 2006, 01:52 PM
ps3 is shit 360 smokes it

Cheesy ov hpool !!!
3rd June 2006, 02:00 PM
ps3 is shit 360 smokes it

HOW YANO THT LIKE M8 PS3 ISNT OUT YET SO CANT SAY TILL BOTH ARE OUT AND THAT REALLY

caskie
3rd June 2006, 02:01 PM
i duno bwt the ps3's but the 360 r mint

charlton
12th June 2006, 01:17 AM
fuck sony thay shud stick to what there good at makeing hi-fis and tv,s

never owned a playstation in my life and never will.

xbox will always have the upper hand over sony i dont beleave a tv company will ever beat a comuper company at makeing cumputers

xbox1 had xbox live thay took that and made it better on the 360.. while sony has nothing for online gameing (THATS WHAT ITS ALL ABOUT ) playing single player games is for 10yr old kids if you ask me .. i went live and once youve done that theres no goin bk to single player it just seems pointless.....
with xbox live on the xbox1 thay took sumthing good and made it better on the 360 ............... sony is trying to take sumthing that isnt there and make it beat xbox live

Tommy2k4
12th June 2006, 02:05 AM
Stick to what they're good at? PS1 sold 100million units in 10 years, PS2 sold 100million units in 5 years, both outselling any other console ever. Xbox sold 25million units in under 5 years, Gamecube sold 21million units in 5 years.

charlton
12th June 2006, 08:50 AM
just means theres plenty more offline gamers out there...( PEOPLE THAT ARE BEHIND THE TIMES )

there was over 2000 million normal tv,s sold in 30 year

only 50 million high def tv,s sold since thay have been out

dose that mean normal tv,s are better

Tommy2k4
12th June 2006, 10:16 AM
Who wants to buy a HD-TV when there is next to no content being broadcasted in it and the first HD-DVD drives can't even output at full 1080p resolution. PS2 is still selling 200k units a month when the xbox 360 is struggling 300k units a month (when they shippped out 1.7million so don't blame it on low supply)

DJ FRENZEE
12th June 2006, 11:53 AM
fuck sony thay shud stick to what there good at makeing hi-fis and tv,s

never owned a playstation in my life and never will.

xbox will always have the upper hand over sony i dont beleave a tv company will ever beat a comuper company at makeing cumputers

xbox1 had xbox live thay took that and made it better on the 360.. while sony has nothing for online gameing (THATS WHAT ITS ALL ABOUT ) playing single player games is for 10yr old kids if you ask me .. i went live and once youve done that theres no goin bk to single player it just seems pointless.....
with xbox live on the xbox1 thay took sumthing good and made it better on the 360 ............... sony is trying to take sumthing that isnt there and make it beat xbox live

wots ya gamer tag for live coz al add ya???

dazscott05
12th June 2006, 01:16 PM
ps3 wil b loads better but the price wil prove it n all

CHRIS-SCOTT
12th June 2006, 01:29 PM
the ps3 will wipe the floor with the xbox 360 lyk

charlton
12th June 2006, 03:16 PM
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LETS ASK THE PROs !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


XBOX 360 / PLAYSTATION 3 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON

SUMMARY
Now that the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 specifications have been announced, it is possible to do a real world performance comparison of the two systems.

There are three critical performance aspects of a console:

Central Processing Unit (CPU) performance.

The Xbox 360 CPU architecture has three times the general purpose processing power of the Cell. than the PS3

Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) performance

The Xbox 360 GPU design is more flexible and it has more processing power more than 6 times the power of the PS3 GPU.

Memory System Bandwidth

The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3's by five times.

CHRIS-SCOTT
15th June 2006, 12:46 PM
So I Guess The 360 Is Betta Then Lol

Deka
15th June 2006, 01:01 PM
ps3 will be the boyo, dont like xbox's myself!

CHRIS-SCOTT
15th June 2006, 02:22 PM
i a dont lyk the x box lyk

charlton
15th June 2006, 05:15 PM
loads of people like playstation for some reason. some even said it was better than the xbox1 wich is abit silly if you ask me coz of the simple fact that the PS2 is the same power as the dreamcast.

Marky_P
15th June 2006, 07:36 PM
HOW YANO THT LIKE M8 PS3 ISNT OUT YET SO CANT SAY TILL BOTH ARE OUT AND THAT REALLY

ps3 is nearly 600 quid?? and somthing like 60/70quid a game know i wont be payin that kinda cash like :576:

Marky_P
15th June 2006, 07:46 PM
wots ya gamer tag for live coz al add ya???
add me if u got 360 chief ill woop you some time ;)

its p0well 0 = ZeRo

Deka
15th June 2006, 10:37 PM
loads of people like playstation for some reason. some even said it was better than the xbox1 wich is abit silly if you ask me coz of the simple fact that the PS2 is the same power as the dreamcast.

playstations are miles better m8, 10 times smaller, control pads arent big daft things!

CHRIS-SCOTT
15th June 2006, 10:42 PM
i ana the pads r fkn massive
after ya finish a game ov fiffa it feels lyk yav dun an hour sesh on the weights lol

Deka
15th June 2006, 10:44 PM
i ana the pads r fkn massive
after ya finish a game ov fiffa it feels lyk yav dun an hour sesh on the weights lol

ha ha chris you know it lmfao!

charlton
16th June 2006, 08:49 PM
playstations are miles better m8, 10 times smaller, control pads arent big daft things!


playstation is miles worse m8 what happednt to common scence... look at the facts. playstation 2 is the same power as the dreamcast dose that mean dreamcast was miles better. i it was better but i wouldnt say miles better than the playstation. fair enough the pads were better on the dreamcast but saying that even the mega drive pads were better.

playstation 1 pads are shit

dj_chrissy_c_2k5
16th June 2006, 09:00 PM
tbh how r playstation pads shit? they r gud size n fit in ya hands comftably. the xbox controllers r huge n ya hav 2 hav fukin massive hands to even reach sum of the buttons lol

ps3 wil b well beta - dont rly lyk the xboxs lyk. n sum1 in tha thred earlier sed xbox 1 had online play n playstation didnt but ps2 n xbox 1 were the same generation of consoles so xbox didnt beat ps there :576: lol

charlton
16th June 2006, 10:31 PM
tbh how r playstation pads shit? they r gud size n fit in ya hands comftably. the xbox controllers r huge n ya hav 2 hav fukin massive hands to even reach sum of the buttons lol

ps3 wil b well beta - dont rly lyk the xboxs lyk. n sum1 in tha thred earlier sed xbox 1 had online play n playstation didnt but ps2 n xbox 1 were the same generation of consoles so xbox didnt beat ps there :576: lol

ps2 was 2 generations behind the xbox1

8bit saga master system & nintendo

16bit mega drive & super nintendo

32bit ps1

64bit n64

128bit dreamcast & ps2

256bit nintendo game cube

xbox1 took the step past bits and gave consoles an new level of processing power how can you say there the same generation of console.

out classed. is all you can say

Tommy2k4
16th June 2006, 11:03 PM
ps2 was 2 generations behind the xbox1

8bit saga master system & nintendo

16bit mega drive & super nintendo

32bit ps1

64bit n64

128bit dreamcast & ps2

256bit nintendo game cube

xbox1 took the step past bits and gave consoles an new level of processing power how can you say there the same generation of console.

out classed. is all you can say
How can you take a step past bits? Anything digital is made of bits and there is no way around it. More powerful isn't everything, PS1 way more successful than N64, PS2 way more sucessful than dreamcast, gamecube & xbox. The only things that can decide how successful a console will be is the cost, marketing, games and how much people like it.

charlton
17th June 2006, 12:59 AM
yeah its still bits but its mesured in a lerger format once you pass 500. and yes power isnt everything were not talking about the sucess of of the systems. were talking about what will be better.

if its an arguement of pesonal opinion it could go on for ever

but if its based on facts its not to hard to see what is or will be better.

thats what ive been saying from the start.






( SO THE FACT IS XBOX IS BETTER )

( THE OPINION IS PLAYSTATION IS BETTER )


i just think facts are more reliable then opinions

dj_chrissy_c_2k5
17th June 2006, 07:10 PM
ps2 was 2 generations behind the xbox1

8bit saga master system & nintendo

16bit mega drive & super nintendo

32bit ps1

64bit n64

128bit dreamcast & ps2

256bit nintendo game cube

xbox1 took the step past bits and gave consoles an new level of processing power how can you say there the same generation of console.

out classed. is all you can say

ps2 n xbox1 n gamecube were all the same generation:7838:

charlton
17th June 2006, 11:20 PM
lol you think just coz thay came out at allmost the same time that means there the same generation.

i think you shud look up what next generation means before you say stuff it will stop people thinking you dont have a clue what your on about

Dj RoB ST
19th June 2006, 10:07 AM
no point getting this worked up over which is better, to be honest i doubt they going to be that much difference in the games that are on both p3 and 360 when they both out. ya can play sonys online as well and dont have to pay to do it on da sonys. one is bound to be a higher spec than the others but its how ya use it with the games that come out and the price of the kit and games that come out on the machines that make the consoles better buys than the others, no point having a mint spec console if ya dont get the top games come out on em

K*A*T*H*Y
6th July 2006, 09:08 PM
no point getting this worked up over which is better, to be honest i doubt they going to be that much difference in the games that are on both p3 and 360 when they both out. ya can play sonys online as well and dont have to pay to do it on da sonys. one is bound to be a higher spec than the others but its how ya use it with the games that come out and the price of the kit and games that come out on the machines that make the consoles better buys than the others, no point having a mint spec console if ya dont get the top games come out on em

aye ya rite like we have the 360 and what a pile of crap. @ least with the PS2 there is a good choice of games and all competive prices. I mean if you bought the console when if first came out then you have to play the waiting game fdor all the games to come out for that machine. We got it when it first came out and had a choice of about 5 games to play on. None of the ones we like either. I think people should wait before they buy the ps3 or 360 untill they come down in price and there is alot more games.

charlton
7th July 2006, 04:44 PM
aye ya rite like we have the 360 and what a pile of crap. @ least with the PS2 there is a good choice of games and all competive prices. I mean if you bought the console when if first came out then you have to play the waiting game fdor all the games to come out for that machine. We got it when it first came out and had a choice of about 5 games to play on. None of the ones we like either. I think people should wait before they buy the ps3 or 360 untill they come down in price and there is alot more games.

i pay 2 quid for my 360 games cant get any cheaper than that & i got mine the 1st day it came out there was 20 release games

Tommy2k4
7th July 2006, 11:39 PM
Course you can get cheaper than that, only thing I paid for any of me PS2 games was the cost of a blank DVD which are cheap as fuck these days. Wouldn't dare buy a console unless I could get it chipped. Plus, 360 chipping hasn't been out that long so you must of paid full price for some of the games.

Oh, and there was only 18 Xbox360 launch games ;)

Dj RoB ST
9th July 2006, 01:44 AM
Main Plus Of Gay Stations Are Ya Dont Have To Wait 50 Years To Play Da Latest Gta Game Like U Do With Xboxs , All Down With The Games When It Comes Down To Ur Console And Da Prices

Tommy2k4
9th July 2006, 06:00 AM
Next gta has been promised to be out on x360 and ps3 the same time, not sure, microsoft must of put in a good bid cos sony would of been paying probably in the billions for a GTA ps3 exclusive

K*A*T*H*Y
10th July 2006, 12:40 PM
i pay 2 quid for my 360 games cant get any cheaper than that & i got mine the 1st day it came out there was 20 release games

we got it the first week out but the type of games I like to play on are not available for it. Most of them are now but when it came out it was stuff like gun n that. I wish I could get the games for around what you pay.

fuq1987
10th July 2006, 03:21 PM
360 all the way

Chrissy_D
11th July 2006, 01:04 PM
Playstation 3:8856:

Che
11th July 2006, 03:21 PM
ive got a 360 they decent graphics r mint and that so jus gunna have to waite and see about the ps3

charlton
26th April 2008, 08:10 PM
lol i was right... this post was made before the ps3 relese about what would be the most sucessful :D

Dj RoB ST
27th April 2008, 03:56 AM
pure ill at the kid saying they no need for hd tvs :p